Civil socie­ty orga­ni­sa­ti­ons from across the spec­trum urge EU decis­i­on-makers to reject the mili­ta­ry bud­get sur­ge and invest in human secu­ri­ty ins­tead

Dear Heads of Sta­tes and Govern­ments,

In the run-up to the next Euro­pean Coun­cil taking place this week, at which you will dis­cuss the next Mul­ti­an­nu­al Finan­cial Frame­work (MFF 2028–2034), with a view to rea­ching a final agree­ment by the end of the year, civil socie­ty repre­sen­ta­ti­ves from across the spec­trum are cal­ling on you to oppo­se the EU’s mili­ta­ry bud­get sur­ge and ensu­re tax­pay­ers’ money is inves­ted in what tru­ly pro­tects peo­p­le: health, housing, edu­ca­ti­on, human rights, peace­buil­ding, the envi­ron­ment, and social wel­fa­re. In short, the next EU bud­get should prio­ri­ti­se human secu­ri­ty, not increased mili­ta­ry spen­ding or unche­cked sup­port for busi­ness.

On 14 June, over 12,000 peo­p­le demons­tra­ted in Brussels, cal­ling for “Wel­fa­re not War­fa­re”. The fol­lo­wing day, more than 70 repre­sen­ta­ti­ves of grass­roots move­ments, natio­nal and Euro­pean CSOs and NGOs, trade uni­ons, and experts on peace, cli­ma­te, health, social jus­ti­ce and human rights met to dis­cuss the impact of rising mili­ta­ry bud­gets on public poli­cy and people’s lives. They rai­sed alarm about bud­get shifts at both natio­nal and EU level, dis­cus­sed alter­na­ti­ve bud­get allo­ca­ti­ons, and are cal­ling on you to halt the dra­stic increase in EU mili­ta­ry spen­ding. Ins­tead, they urge you to pre­ser­ve and ear­mark civi­li­an funds for the urgent chal­lenges facing peo­p­le in Euro­pe and bey­ond: envi­ron­men­tal polycrisis1 (e.g. cli­ma­te chan­ge, bio­di­ver­si­ty loss and pol­lu­ti­on), rising pover­ty, dis­cri­mi­na­ti­on and ine­qua­li­ty, inclu­ding in access to public ser­vices ran­ging from edu­ca­ti­on to health­ca­re and housing.

The pro­po­sed Com­pe­ti­ti­ve­ness Fund under the 2028–2034 MFF would allo­ca­te €131 bil­li­on to arma­ment and space, around five times more than in the pre­vious bud­get cycle2, while dedi­ca­ted health and envi­ron­men­tal spen­ding is being remo­ved, and the Euro­pean Social Fund3, the Cohe­si­on poli­cy and the Com­mon agri­cul­tu­ral poli­cy are facing cuts. Addi­tio­nal­ly, EU civi­li­an and regio­nal funds are incre­asing­ly being diver­ted for mili­ta­ry pur­po­ses under the cur­rent MFF4, a trend that will inten­si­fy under the next MFF with easier access for the arms indus­try to other civil fun­ding pots5. This comes on top of the sharp rise in mili­ta­ry spen­ding at natio­nal level, which in many EU count­ries goes hand in hand with austeri­ty mea­su­res, cuts to public ser­vices and the wel­fa­re sta­te, and efforts to attract pri­va­te invest­ment into essen­ti­al ser­vices.6

Moreo­ver, under the ban­ner of “sim­pli­fi­ca­ti­on”, the EU is strip­ping away over­sight and rest­ric­tions on the deve­lo­p­ment, pro­duc­tion and sale of wea­pons and mili­ta­ry tech­no­lo­gy, to the bene­fit of an indus­try who­se pro­ducts are alre­a­dy being used in wars, geno­ci­de and human rights abu­ses around the world.7

We call on Mem­bers of the Euro­pean Par­lia­ment and EU govern­ments to:

  1. Reject the pro­po­sed €131 bil­li­on defence, secu­ri­ty and space enve­lo­pe in the 2028–2034 MFF and halt the mili­ta­ri­sa­ti­on of the EU bud­get.
  2. Redi­rect EU resour­ces towards human secu­ri­ty, e.g. public health, housing, edu­ca­ti­on, care, envi­ron­men­tal and cli­ma­te action, anti-pover­ty mea­su­res, anti-racism, equa­li­ty, acti­ve citi­zen­ship, peace­buil­ding and inter­na­tio­nal coope­ra­ti­on.
  3. Pro­tect civi­li­an EU funds from mili­ta­ry cap­tu­re, inclu­ding cohe­si­on, home affairs, regio­nal deve­lo­p­ment, rese­arch, inter­na­tio­nal coope­ra­ti­on, envi­ron­men­tal and social funds. EU money inten­ded for social, envi­ron­men­tal or regio­nal goals must not be diver­ted to arms com­pa­nies.
  4. Crea­te a bin­ding human rights, envi­ron­men­tal and due dili­gence exclu­si­on frame­work for EU fun­ding, pre­ven­ting public money from going to com­pa­nies invol­ved in war cri­mes, occu­pa­ti­on, repres­si­on, geno­ci­de, envi­ron­men­tal des­truc­tion or serious human rights abu­ses.
  5. Increase EU fun­ding for diplo­ma­cy, media­ti­on, peace­buil­ding and sup­port for civil socie­ty, rather than prio­ri­ti­sing mili­ta­ry pro­cu­re­ment and arms pro­duc­tion.

To illus­tra­te our demands and be con­cre­te, the pro­po­sed €131 bil­li­on defence, secu­ri­ty and space enve­lo­pe under the 2028–2034 MFF could ins­tead finan­ce…

  • …around 1,5 year of the EU’s annu­al ener­gy-sec­tor cli­ma­te invest­ment defi­cit8 (87bn/year), or more than one year of the EU’s buil­ding-rela­ted cli­ma­te invest­ment defi­cit (€120bn/year)9
  • …near­ly 30 times the EU4Health programme’s cur­rent 2021–27 bud­get10
  • …more than two years of the EU’s social and afforda­ble housing invest­ment gap11
  • …almost 12 years of the addi­tio­nal invest­ment nee­ded to meet the EU’s 2030 child­ca­re tar­gets.12 (11bn/year)
  • …more than 13 times the com­bi­ned bud­get allo­ca­ted in 2021–2027 under the inter­na­tio­nal coope­ra­ti­on the­ma­tic lines for peace, human rights, civil socie­ty & glo­bal issues as well as for the EU Rapid Respon­se Actions13
  • …more than five times the mini­mum €25 bil­li­on huma­ni­ta­ri­an aid bud­get that civil socie­ty is cal­ling to secu­re for 2028–203414

The­se are not abs­tract trade-offs. They affect the child­ca­re places, hos­pi­tal wai­ting times, housing cos­ts and ener­gy bills your con­sti­tu­ents face every day. Every euro locked into this seven-year enve­lo­pe is a euro not inves­ted in the ser­vices your con­sti­tu­ents are asking you to pro­tect.

More mili­ta­ry spen­ding will not sol­ve our social, eco­no­mic, envi­ron­men­tal, and poli­ti­cal pro­blems.15 On the con­tra­ry, it deepens them: by diver­ting labour power and finan­cial resour­ces, ent­ren­ching aut­ho­ri­ta­ri­an poli­tics, and fuel­ling arms races which in turn lead to con­flicts, human rights vio­la­ti­ons, and dis­pla­ce­ment.

The world’s mili­ta­ries are alre­a­dy esti­ma­ted to pro­du­ce around 5.5% of total glo­bal green­house gas emis­si­ons16. Increased mili­ta­ry spen­ding will acce­le­ra­te envi­ron­men­tal des­truc­tion and will fur­ther lock Euro­pe into a dan­ge­rous fos­sil fuel depen­den­cy, nega­tively impac­ting our ener­gy secu­ri­ty.

The next EU bud­get is an oppor­tu­ni­ty to choo­se a dif­fe­rent path, one roo­ted in demo­cra­cy, diplo­ma­cy, peace­buil­ding and con­flict pre­ven­ti­on, social jus­ti­ce, pro­tec­tion of human rights, envi­ron­men­tal secu­ri­ty and invest­ment in human digni­ty. A 2018 UN-World Bank report show­ed that every €1 inves­ted in peace­buil­ding can save €16 in cos­ts due to con­flict.17 A 2024 IMF stu­dy found that every $1 spent on con­flict pre­ven­ti­on saves up to $103 in poten­ti­al cos­ts for huma­ni­ta­ri­an and secu­ri­ti­sed inter­ven­ti­ons.18 Inves­t­ing in social spen­ding, fight­ing pover­ty, and redu­cing ine­qua­li­ty is also the most effec­ti­ve way to coun­ter the rise of the far-right.19

By working towards this, you will live up to the pro­mi­se of a pro­ject that has long been pre­sen­ted as a peace initia­ti­ve aimed, among others, at pre­ven­ting a new arms race bet­ween rival mili­ta­ry powers and at enab­ling ever­yo­ne to live in digni­ty.

We urge you to use any oppor­tu­ni­ty to res­ha­pe the MFF befo­re agree­ment is rea­ched at the end of the year. We call on you to ensu­re that the next EU bud­get pro­tects peo­p­le and the pla­net, rather than locking Euro­pe into a future of mili­ta­ri­sa­ti­on, austeri­ty and inse­cu­ri­ty.

Thank you for your atten­ti­on. Plea­se do not hesi­ta­te to cont­act us if you would like to dis­cuss this mat­ter fur­ther.

Sin­ce­re­ly yours,

  • The Trans­na­tio­nal Insti­tu­te (TNI)
  • Euro­pean Net­work Against the Arms Trade (ENAAT)
  • Stop ReArm Euro­pe
  • Arci – Ita­ly
  • Asso­cia­ti­on of Greek Con­sci­en­tious Objec­tors 
  • Attac Aus­tria
  • Attac Spain
  • Cent­re Delàs d’Estudis per la Pau – Spain
  • Cen­tro Pace eco­lo­gia e dirit­ti uma­ni – Rover­eto, Ita­ly
  • Coun­ter Balan­ce
  • Coor­di­na­ti­on Natio­na­le d’Action pour la Paix et la Démo­cra­tie (CNAPD) – Bel­gi­um
  • Cor­rup­ti­on Tra­cker
  • Cor­po­ra­te Euro­pe Obser­va­to­ry (CEO)
  • Debt for Cli­ma­te
  • DiEM25 in Net­her­lands
  • Euro­pean Bureau for Con­sci­en­tious Objec­tion to mili­ta­ry ser­vice (EBCO-BEOC)
  • Euro­pean Coun­cil on Refu­gee and Exi­les (ECRE)
  • Equin­ox Initia­ti­ve for Racial Jus­ti­ce
  • Euro­Me­mo Group 
  • Euro­pean Anti-Pover­ty Net­work (EAPN)
  • Euro­pean Women’s Lob­by
  • Inter­na­tio­nal Peace Bureau (IPB)
  • Inš­ti­tút ľud­s­kých práv Human Rights Insti­tu­te – Hun­ga­ry
  • Kerk en Vre­de – Net­her­lands
  • Lex Inno­cen­ti­um 21st Cen­tu­ry – Ire­land
  • Lis­ta Civica Ita­lia­na – Ita­ly
  • Non­vio­lent Peace­force
  • Obser­va­toire des arme­ments – France
  • Ohne Rüs­tung Leben – Ger­ma­ny
  • Pal­es­ti­ne Soli­da­ri­ty Cluj-Napo­ca – PS.CJ – Roma­nia
  • Peace Direct
  • Pri­va­cy Inter­na­tio­nal
  • Qua­ker Coun­cil for Euro­pean Affairs (QCEA)
  • Rete Ita­lia­na Pace Dis­ar­mo – Ita­ly
  • Salud por Der­echo – Spain
  • Socia­list Visi­on – Roma­nia
  • SOLIDAR
  • Sta­te­watch
  • Sto­pEl­bit – Bel­gi­um
  • Stop Rearm Euro­pe – Ita­ly
  • Stop Wapen­han­del – Net­her­lands
  • Swe­dish Peace and Arbi­tra­ti­on Socie­ty – Swe­den
  • UAnt­werp for Pal­es­ti­ne – Bel­gi­um
  • Vre­de vzw – Bel­gi­um
  • Vre­de­sac­tie – Bel­gi­um
  • Women’s Inter­na­tio­nal League for Peace and Free­dom Aus­tria (WILPF Aus­tria)
  • Women’s Inter­na­tio­nal League for Peace and Free­dom Ger­ma­ny (WILPF Ger­ma­ny)
  • World BEYOND War

Cre­dits

  1. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/environmental-outlook-on-the-tripl… (exter­nal link)
  2. https://www.tni.org/en/publication/military-and-related-spending-in-the…
  3. https://easpd.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/Publications/Policy_Papers/Joint… (exter­nal link)
  4. https://www.tni.org/en/publication/eu-military-spending-until-2027
  5. https://www.tni.org/en/publication/military-and-related-spending-in-the…
  6. For exam­p­le https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/finland-spend-32-gdp… (exter­nal link); https://www.reuters.com/business/new-dutch-government-plans-freedom-tax… (exter­nal link) ; https://www.reuters.com/world/french-pm-stakes-political-survival-budge… (exter­nal link)
  7. See for exam­p­le https://www.tni.org/en/publication/partners-in-crime-EU-complicity-Israel-genocide-Gaza; https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2024/11/sudan-french-manufactured-weapons-system-identified-in-conflict-new-investigation/ (exter­nal link) ; Report of Delàs Cen­ter, ECP and IDHC: Arms trade, con­flicts and human rights. Ana­ly­sis of Euro­pean arms exports to count­ries in armed con­flict and human rights vio­la­ti­ons (2020); https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20171127IPR88940/yeme… (exter­nal link)
  8. https://www.i4ce.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/The-State-of-Europes-Cl… (exter­nal link)
  9. Ibid.
  10. https://health.ec.europa.eu/funding/eu4health-programme-2021–2027-visio… (exter­nal link)
  11. https://pes.cor.europa.eu/article/affordable-housing-needs-europe-europ… (exter­nal link)
  12. https://op.europa.eu/webpub/empl/esde-2024/chapters/chapter‑3–3‑1.html (exter­nal link)
  13. https://international-partnerships.ec.europa.eu/funding-and-technical‑a… (exter­nal link)
  14. https://eplo.org/eplo-publications/joint-call-ensuring-that-the-global-… (exter­nal link)
  15. https://www.greenpeace.org/static/planet4-italy-stateless/2023/11/d4d11… (exter­nal link)
  16. https://www.tni.org/en/publication/climate-collateral-2pagebriefing
  17. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/entities/publication/4c36fca6-c7e0-… (exter­nal link)
  18. http://www.imf.org/en/publications/wp/issues/2024/12/17/the-urgency-of-… (exter­nal link)
  19. e.g. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348931106_Welfare_state_polici… (exter­nal link); Klein M. – The Poli­ti­cal Cos­ts of Austerity.pdf
×