Public Phar­ma: A Reme­dy for Drug Shorta­ges

Medikamtenblister auf dem Nachtisch

Alan Ros­si Sil­va[1], Jan Wint­gens[2]

In hos­pi­tals, phar­maci­es, and cli­nics across Euro­pe, a silent emer­gen­cy is unfol­ding. Drug shorta­ges have beco­me so fre­quent, so per­va­si­ve, that they now con­sti­tu­te a public health cri­sis.[3] In Ger­ma­ny alo­ne, near­ly 1,500 drug sup­p­ly shorta­ges were recor­ded in 2023—almost three times more than in 2021.[4] Near­ly every hos­pi­tal phar­macist sur­vey­ed in the coun­try ack­now­led­ges the impact: shorta­ges under­mi­ne their abili­ty to care for pati­ents effec­tively.[5] Behind the­se figu­res lies a deeper sto­ry of sys­te­mic dysfunction—and the urgent need for bold, struc­tu­ral solu­ti­ons roo­ted in the public inte­rest.

Under­stan­ding the Struc­tu­ral Roots and Con­se­quen­ces of Drug Shorta­ges

Drug shorta­ges are often por­tray­ed as unfort­u­na­te yet mana­geable dis­rup­ti­ons in an other­wi­se effi­ci­ent phar­maceu­ti­cal sys­tem. But this framing obscu­res the true natu­re of the cri­sis. In rea­li­ty, the­se shorta­ges are the pre­dic­ta­ble out­co­me of a model built around the logic of pro­fit maxi­miza­ti­on, not around public health. What we are wit­nessing is not an acci­den­tal fail­ure; it is the result of struc­tu­ral choices.

A wide ran­ge of fac­tors has been his­to­ri­cal­ly rai­sed as cau­ses of medi­ci­ne shorta­ges. Some are cir­cum­stan­ti­al or logi­sti­cal, such as sea­so­nal fluc­tua­tions in demand,[6] natu­ral dis­as­ters, or sud­den shifts in epi­de­mio­lo­gi­cal trends.[7] Others are regu­la­to­ry in natu­re, inclu­ding stric­ter manu­fac­tu­ring stan­dards[8] or natio­nal stock requi­re­ments.[9] But beneath the­se sur­face-level expl­ana­ti­ons lies a deeper, sys­te­mic pro­blem: the com­mo­di­fi­ca­ti­on of health.

One of the most cited cau­ses is the low pro­fi­ta­bi­li­ty of cer­tain medi­ci­nes, espe­ci­al­ly older gene­rics, which has led many manu­fac­tu­r­ers to aban­don enti­re pro­duct lines.[10] This phe­no­me­non is some­ti­mes refer­red to as the “pri­ce screw”: a situa­ti­on in which the pres­su­re to lower cos­ts and reim­bur­se­ments lea­ves com­pa­nies with litt­le incen­ti­ve to con­ti­nue pro­duc­tion.[11] In Ger­ma­ny, in 2023, 30% of gene­ric drug manu­fac­tu­r­ers expec­ted to with­draw bet­ween 10 and 50% of their pro­duct port­fo­li­os within the fol­lo­wing year, and ano­ther 70% anti­ci­pa­ted drop­ping up to 10%.[12] This is not an iso­la­ted decis­i­on; it reflects a broa­der pat­tern of mar­ket retre­at.

The con­cen­tra­ti­on of pro­duc­tion in a few glo­bal sites, main­ly in Chi­na and India, has crea­ted a just-in-time sys­tem opti­mi­zed for cost but vul­nerable to dis­rup­ti­on. The­se loca­ti­ons are cho­sen not by coin­ci­dence, but becau­se of lower labour cos­ts and wea­k­er envi­ron­men­tal regu­la­ti­ons.[13] It is not envi­ron­men­tal poli­cy or worker pro­tec­tions that are the problem—it is the pro­fit moti­ve that trans­forms them into lia­bi­li­ties.[14] When the pro­duc­tion of acti­ve phar­maceu­ti­cal ingre­di­ents is out­sour­ced to maxi­mi­ze pro­fit mar­gins, sup­p­ly chains beco­me lon­ger, more opaque, and more fra­gi­le.

Addi­tio­nal con­tri­bu­ting fac­tors include the mono­po­liza­ti­on of sup­p­ly by a small num­ber of pro­du­cers,[15] lack of trans­pa­ren­cy from phar­maceu­ti­cal com­pa­nies, the absence of stra­te­gic reser­ves, and a gene­ral under­in­vest­ment in dome­stic and regio­nal pro­duc­tion capa­ci­ty.[16] Mean­while, smal­ler or less pro­fi­ta­ble mar­kets are often deprio­ri­ti­zed, with com­pa­nies choo­sing to ser­ve more lucra­ti­ve regi­ons first.

The con­se­quen­ces of the­se shorta­ges are wide-ran­ging and deep­ly harmful. Pati­ents face delays in tre­at­ment or are forced to inter­rupt the­ra­pies altog­e­ther.[17] The lack of available alter­na­ti­ves increa­ses the risk of medi­ca­ti­on errors and adver­se reac­tions. In some cases, pati­ents are pushed towards more expen­si­ve opti­ons, incre­asing their out-of-pocket cos­ts. In others, the only available path beco­mes the infor­mal or black mar­ket, whe­re safe­ty and qua­li­ty are far from gua­ran­teed.[18]

Phar­macists and health­ca­re pro­fes­sio­nals are also impac­ted. Their workload increa­ses as they scram­ble to find sub­sti­tu­tes, navi­ga­te pro­cu­re­ment hurd­les, and reassu­re worried pati­ents. Trust in the health­ca­re sys­tem is affec­ted.[19] And cli­ni­cal rese­arch can be delay­ed or com­pro­mi­sed when essen­ti­al drugs are unavailable for tri­als.[20]

The social and eco­no­mic toll is pro­found. Vul­nerable populations—those with limi­t­ed finan­cial means, com­plex health con­di­ti­ons, or rest­ric­ted mobility—are hit har­dest. What beg­ins as a sup­p­ly chain issue quick­ly beco­mes a mat­ter of jus­ti­ce, equi­ty, and public trust.

Drug shorta­ges are not iso­la­ted anoma­lies. They are the visi­ble sym­ptoms of a deeper sys­te­mic crisis—one that demands more than tech­ni­cal fixes. They reve­al the fail­ure of a model that tre­ats health tech­no­lo­gies as mar­ket com­mo­di­ties ins­tead of public goods. Any real solu­ti­on must start from that reco­gni­ti­on.

Fla­wed Respon­ses to a Struc­tu­ral Pro­blem

Public aut­ho­ri­ties, aca­de­mics, and pro­fes­sio­nal asso­cia­ti­ons have pro­po­sed a ran­ge of respon­ses, but most fall into three broad cate­go­ries.

The first group con­sists of mea­su­res that aim to impro­ve how to dia­gno­se the pro­blem. The­se include efforts to har­mo­ni­ze ter­mi­no­lo­gy and report­ing stan­dards,[21] increase trans­pa­ren­cy in sup­p­ly chains,[22] and streng­then regu­la­to­ry over­sight.[23] The­se are important steps, but they remain limi­t­ed in scope. They help us under­stand the con­tours of the cri­sis more cle­ar­ly, but they do not alter its under­ly­ing cau­ses.

The second cate­go­ry includes attempts to mana­ge scar­ci­ty rather than pre­vent it. Govern­ments have encou­ra­ged phar­macists to sub­sti­tu­te unavailable medi­ci­nes, cal­led for the redis­tri­bu­ti­on of sup­pli­es across bor­ders,[24] exten­ded the expi­ra­ti­on dates of cer­tain drugs,[25] and built up emer­gen­cy stock­pi­les.[26] In the best sce­na­rio, the­se poli­ci­es can miti­ga­te harm in the short term, but they repre­sent a stra­tegy of con­tain­ment rather than trans­for­ma­ti­on. They accept scar­ci­ty as a given and mere­ly try to make it more tole­ra­ble.

Even more troubling, howe­ver, is the third group of so-cal­led “solu­ti­ons”: tho­se that dan­ge­rous­ly rein­force the very logic respon­si­ble for the pro­blem. Pro­po­sals to pay more for medi­ci­nes,[27] to dere­gu­la­te phar­maceu­ti­cal pro­duc­tion,[28] or to loo­sen envi­ron­men­tal stan­dards[29] all point in the wrong direc­tion. Rather than pro­tec­ting the public, the­se mea­su­res deepen our depen­den­cy on mar­ket forces and push us fur­ther away from health equi­ty and sus­taina­bi­li­ty.

Public Phar­ma: A Real Alter­na­ti­ve

If the dia­gno­sis is fla­wed, so too will be the tre­at­ment. Ins­tead of mana­ging scar­ci­ty or sur­ren­de­ring to cor­po­ra­te pres­su­re, we must ask a dif­fe­rent ques­ti­on: how do we build a phar­maceu­ti­cal eco­sys­tem that puts peo­p­le befo­re pro­fit?[30] The ans­wer beg­ins with Public Phar­ma.[31]

Public Phar­ma is not a uto­pian ide­al.[32] It is a prac­ti­cal, neces­sa­ry respon­se to the struc­tu­ral fail­ures of the cur­rent model.[33] It refers to sta­te-owned infra­struc­tu­re dedi­ca­ted to rese­arch, deve­lo­p­ment, manu­fac­tu­ring, and/or dis­tri­bu­ti­on of health tech­no­lo­gies. It means crea­ting sys­tems that are trans­pa­rent, resi­li­ent, accoun­ta­ble, and respon­si­ve to health needs, not share­hol­der expec­ta­ti­ons.[34]

And it is alre­a­dy hap­pe­ning. Around the world, the­re is a rich and diver­se eco­sys­tem of public phar­maceu­ti­cal insti­tu­ti­ons. Govern­ments have built public manu­fac­tu­ring capa­ci­ty to pro­du­ce health tech­no­lo­gies. The­se initia­ti­ves have impro­ved access, sup­port­ed regio­nal self-reli­ance, and pro­mo­ted health sovereignty—often under immense poli­ti­cal and eco­no­mic pres­su­re.[35]

Euro­pe, too, is part of this move­ment. In Por­tu­gal, the Natio­nal Medi­ci­nes Labo­ra­to­ry has long play­ed a cru­cial role in pro­du­cing afforda­ble, high-qua­li­ty medi­ci­nes.[36] In Swe­den, the natio­nal medi­ci­nes agen­cy has indi­ca­ted that a sta­te-run phar­maceu­ti­cal pro­duc­tion com­pa­ny should address shorta­ges of cri­ti­cal medi­ci­nes.[37] In count­ries like Switz­er­land[38] and France[39], poli­ti­cal par­ties have publicly advo­ca­ted for the deve­lo­p­ment of a coor­di­na­ted Public Phar­ma stra­tegy. Mean­while, across the con­ti­nent, aca­de­mics[40] and acti­vists[41] have been cal­ling for the estab­lish­ment of a Euro­pean-wide Public Phar­ma initia­ti­ve to ensu­re secu­re, equi­ta­ble access to health tech­no­lo­gies.

The­se efforts are valuable and inspi­ring, but they remain under con­stant thre­at. Across all regi­ons, public phar­maceu­ti­cal insti­tu­ti­ons are being wea­k­en­ed by neo­li­be­ral waves of austeri­ty, bud­get cuts, and pri­va­tiza­ti­on.[42] Their con­tin­ued exis­tence is far from gua­ran­teed. To ful­fil their poten­ti­al, they must be actively defen­ded and deli­bera­te­ly expan­ded.[43]

The Time to Act is Now

In 2024, civil socie­ty orga­niza­ti­ons, rese­ar­chers, and health advo­ca­tes from across Euro­pe came tog­e­ther to form the Public Phar­ma for Euro­pe Coali­ti­on.[44] We are united by a simp­le but powerful belief: access to medi­ci­nes and other health tech­no­lo­gies should never depend on mar­ket logic. Our coali­ti­on calls for a new paradigm—one that places public phar­maceu­ti­cal capa­ci­ty at the cen­ter of health poli­cy. One that ensu­res that health is a human right, not a com­mo­di­ty.

As the cli­ma­te emer­gen­cy deepens, geo­po­li­ti­cal ten­si­ons rise, and eco­no­mic ine­qua­li­ties shar­pen, the risk of drug shorta­ges will only grow. Let us not wait for the next wave of pre­ven­ta­ble suf­fe­ring. Let us act now—with urgen­cy, cla­ri­ty, and courage—and build the public infra­struc­tu­re nee­ded to pro­mo­te health for all.


[1] Glo­bal and Euro­pean Coor­di­na­tor of the Public Phar­ma pro­ject at the People’s Health Move­ment (PHM); PhD in Law.

[2] PHM mem­ber; Public Phar­ma for Euro­pe advo­ca­te; PhD in Neu­ro­sci­ence.

[3] Vog­ler, S. (2024). Tack­ling medi­ci­ne shorta­ges during and after the COVID-19 pan­de­mic: Com­pi­la­ti­on of govern­men­tal poli­cy mea­su­res and deve­lo­p­ments in 38 count­ries. Health Poli­cy, 143, 105030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105030.

[4] Van Den Heu­vel, M. (2024). Germany’s medi­ca­ti­on sup­p­ly issues per­sist despi­te new law. Med­scape. https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/germanys-medication-supply-issues-persist-despite-new-law-2024a1000k9a.

[5] Euro­pean Asso­cia­ti­on of Hos­pi­tal Phar­macists (EAHP). (2023). EAHP 2023 Shorta­ge Sur­vey Report: Shorta­ges of medi­ci­nes and devices in the hos­pi­tal sec­tor – pre­va­lence, natu­re and impact on pati­ent care. https://eahp.eu/policy-hub/medicines-shortages/2023-shortage-survey/.

[6] Wil­lis, S. (2025) ‘Con­fu­sing blur’ bet­ween genui­ne medi­ci­nes shorta­ges and pro­cu­re­ment issues, says who­le­sa­lers trade body. The Phar­maceu­ti­cal Jour­nal. https://pharmaceutical-journal.com/article/news/confusing-blur-between-genuine-medicines-shortages-and-procurement-issues-says-wholesalers-trade-body.

[7] Van Den Heu­vel, M. (2024). Germany’s medi­ca­ti­on sup­p­ly issues per­sist despi­te new law. Med­scape. https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/germanys-medication-supply-issues-persist-despite-new-law-2024a1000k9a.

[8] Pater­nos­ter, T. (2024). How did Ger­ma­ny run low on poten­ti­al­ly life-saving HIV medi­ca­ti­on? Euro­news. https://www.euronews.com/health/2024/04/13/how-did-germany-run-low-on-potentially-life-saving-hiv-medication.

[9] Eccles, M., & Pes­ecky­tė, G. (2024). Cze­chia slams Ger­ma­ny over drug stock­pi­ling. POLITICO. https://www.politico.eu/article/czechia-slams-germany-over-drug-stockpiling-drug-shortage-europe-pharmacy/.

[10] Bara­ni­uk, C. (2024). What are count­ries doing to tack­le wor­sening drug shorta­ges? BMJ, q2380. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q2380

[11] Steidl, J., Krebs, S., Kos­tev, K., Schwab, S., & Hamer, H. M. (2024). Shorta­ge of anti­sei­zu­re medi­ca­ti­on in Ger­ma­ny: How big is the pro­blem? Epi­le­psy & Beha­vi­or, 162, 110162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.110162.

[12] Van Den Heu­vel, M. (2024). Germany’s medi­ca­ti­on sup­p­ly issues per­sist despi­te new law. Med­scape. https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/germanys-medication-supply-issues-persist-despite-new-law-2024a1000k9a.

[13] Ver­band For­schen­der Arz­nei­mit­tel­her­stel­ler (n.d.). Sup­p­ly bot­t­len­ecks can have dif­fe­rent cau­ses. https://www.vfa.de/de/englische-inhalte/supply-shortages

[14] Wint­gens, J. (2025). Is Big Pharma’s pol­lu­ti­on dere­gu­la­ti­on cam­paign fue­ling the next pan­de­mic? Peo­p­les Dis­patch. https://peoplesdispatch.org/2025/03/15/is-big-pharmas-pollution-deregulation-campaign-fueling-the-next-pandemic/.

[15] Höpp­ner, S. (2024). What’s behind medi­ca­ti­on shorta­ges in Ger­ma­ny? Deut­sche Wel­le. https://www.dw.com/en/whats-behind-medication-shortages-in-germany/a‑70446933.

[16] Plüss, J. D. & Turuban, P. (2025). Five ways health aut­ho­ri­ties hope to end medi­ci­ne shorta­ges. SWI. https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/multinational-companies/five-ways-authorities-hope-to-end-medicine-shortages/88784833.

[17] Steidl, J., Krebs, S., Kos­tev, K., Schwab, S., & Hamer, H. M. (2024). Shorta­ge of anti­sei­zu­re medi­ca­ti­on in Ger­ma­ny: How big is the pro­blem? Epi­le­psy & Beha­vi­or, 162, 110162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.110162.

[18] Euro­pean com­mu­ni­ty phar­macists (PGEU). (2024). Posi­ti­on paper on medi­ci­ne shorta­ges. https://www.pgeu.eu/publications/pgeu-position-paper-on-medicine-shortages-2024/.

[19] Pater­nos­ter, T. (2024). How did Ger­ma­ny run low on poten­ti­al­ly life-saving HIV medi­ca­ti­on? Euro­news. https://www.euronews.com/health/2024/04/13/how-did-germany-run-low-on-potentially-life-saving-hiv-medication.

[20] Vog­ler, S. (2024). Tack­ling medi­ci­ne shorta­ges during and after the COVID-19 pan­de­mic: Com­pi­la­ti­on of govern­men­tal poli­cy mea­su­res and deve­lo­p­ments in 38 count­ries. Health Poli­cy, 143, 105030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105030.

[21] Euro­pean com­mu­ni­ty phar­macists (PGEU). (2024). Posi­ti­on paper on medi­ci­ne shorta­ges. https://www.pgeu.eu/publications/pgeu-position-paper-on-medicine-shortages-2024/.

[22] Plüss, J. D. & Turuban, P. (2025). Five ways health aut­ho­ri­ties hope to end medi­ci­ne shorta­ges. SWI. https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/multinational-companies/five-ways-authorities-hope-to-end-medicine-shortages/88784833.

[23] Vog­ler, S. (2024). Tack­ling medi­ci­ne shorta­ges during and after the COVID-19 pan­de­mic: Com­pi­la­ti­on of govern­men­tal poli­cy mea­su­res and deve­lo­p­ments in 38 count­ries. Health Poli­cy, 143, 105030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105030.

[24] Euro­pean com­mu­ni­ty phar­macists (PGEU). (2024). Posi­ti­on paper on medi­ci­ne shorta­ges. https://www.pgeu.eu/publications/pgeu-position-paper-on-medicine-shortages-2024/

[25] Davi­do, B., Miche­lon, H., Mamo­na, C., De Truchis, P., Jaf­fal, K., & Saleh-Mghir, A. (2024). Effi­ca­cy of expi­red anti­bio­tics: a real deba­te in the con­text of repea­ted drug shorta­ges. Anti­bio­tics, 13(5), 466. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13050466.

[26] Eccles, M., & Pes­ecky­tė, G. (2024). Cze­chia slams Ger­ma­ny over drug stock­pi­ling. POLITICO. https://www.politico.eu/article/czechia-slams-germany-over-drug-stockpiling-drug-shortage-europe-pharmacy/.

[27] Bara­ni­uk, C. (2024). What are count­ries doing to tack­le wor­sening drug shorta­ges? BMJ, q2380. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q2380.

[28] Höpp­ner, S. (2024). What’s behind medi­ca­ti­on shorta­ges in Ger­ma­ny? Deut­sche Wel­le. https://www.dw.com/en/whats-behind-medication-shortages-in-germany/a‑70446933.

[29] Van Den Heu­vel, M. (2024). Germany’s medi­ca­ti­on sup­p­ly issues per­sist despi­te new law. Med­scape. https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/germanys-medication-supply-issues-persist-despite-new-law-2024a1000k9a.

[30] Rad­der, H., & Smiers, R. (2024). Medi­cal rese­arch wit­hout patents: It’s pre­fera­ble, it’s pro­fi­ta­ble, and it’s prac­ti­ca­ble. Accoun­ta­bi­li­ty in Rese­arch, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2024.2324913

[31] Sil­va, A. (2024). Public phar­ma vs. abu­si­ve pri­ces: The case of the latest HIV-pre­ven­ti­on drug. Peo­p­les Dis­patch. https://peoplesdispatch.org/2024/09/10/public-pharma-vs-abusive-prices-the-case-of-the-latest-hiv-prevention-drug/

[32] Sil­va, A., & Smiers, J. (2024). 29 years wit­hout Jonas Salk: Against the nor­ma­liza­ti­on of the absurd. Peo­p­les Dis­patch. https://peoplesdispatch.org/2024/06/21/29-years-without-jonas-salk-against-the-normalization-of-the-absurd/

[33] Brown, D. (2019). Medi­ci­ne For All: The Case for a Public Opti­on in the Phar­maceu­ti­cal Indus­try (Demo­cra­cy Col­la­bo­ra­ti­ve, Ed.; pp. 1–88). Demo­cra­cy Col­la­bo­ra­ti­ve. https://thenextsystem.org/medicineforall

[34] People’s Health Move­ment (PHM). (2025). Public Phar­ma: what it is and why it’s important? https://phmovement.org/public-pharma.

[35] Als­ton, K., Le, J., Koon­ce, N., & Rosa, Z. (2024). PBM, Pro­cu­re­ment, and pro­duc­tion: Public Phar­ma stra­te­gies for sta­te to lower insu­lin pri­ces. T1 Inter­na­tio­nal. https://actionnetwork.org/forms/publicpharma

[36] Labora­tório Nacio­nal do Medic­men­to (LM). (2025). Sob­re nós. https://lm.exercito.pt/lab/sobre-nos/.

[37] Kle­ja, M. (2024). Swe­dish medi­ci­nes agen­cy wants sta­te-run phar­ma pro­duc­tion to pre­vent shorta­ges. Eurac­tiv. https://www.euractiv.com/section/health-consumers/news/swedish-medicines-agency-wants-state-run-pharma-production-to-prevent-shortages/.

[38] Par­ti Socia­lis­te Suis­se. (2024). Cri­se du médi­ca­ment : le PS deman­de une stra­té­gie d’industrie phar­maceu­tique publi­que (Public Phar­ma). https://www.sp-ps.ch/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Crise-du-medicament-le-PS-demand  e‑une-strategie-dindustrie-pharmaceutique-publique-2024.pdf

[39] Mon­tan­gon, M. (2023). Not­re pro­po­si­ti­on con­crè­te d’un pôle public du médi­ca­ment. Les Cahiers de San­té et de Pro­tec­tion Socia­le. https://cahiersdesante.fr/editions/46-septembre-2023/notre-proposition-concrete-dun-pole-public-du-medicament/.

[40] Flo­rio, M., Pan­cot­ti, C., & Pro­chaz­ka, D. (2021). Euro­pean phar­maceu­ti­cal rese­arch and deve­lo­p­ment: Could public infra­struc­tu­re over­co­me mar­ket fail­ures? (Euro­pean Par­lia­ment, Ed.; pp. 1–110). https://www.europarl.europa.eu/stoa/en/document/EPRS_STU(2021)697197.

[41] De Ceu­ke­lai­re, & Joye, T. (2024). A Euro­pean Salk Insti­tu­te Could Ensu­re Acces­si­ble and Afforda­ble Medi­ci­nes. Inter­na­tio­nal Jour­nal of Social Deter­mi­nants of Health and Health Ser­vices. https://doi.org/10.1177/27551938241232239.

[42] Hen­driks, J. (2021). The Pri­va­tiza­ti­on of Socie­tal Vac­ci­no­lo­gy in the Net­her­lands. In Immu­niza­ti­on and Sta­tes (1st ed., pp. 20–43). Rout­ledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003130345–2/privatization-societal-vaccinology-netherlands-jan-hendriks.

[43] Public Phar­ma for Euro­pe Coali­ti­on (2025). In defen­se of public phar­ma at the Uni­ver­si­ty Medi­cal Cen­ter Gro­nin­gen: A State­ment of soli­da­ri­ty. https://publicpharmaforeurope.org/in-defense-of-public-pharma-at-the-university-medical-center-groningen-a-statement-of-solidarity/.

[44] Public Phar­ma for Euro­pe Coali­ti­on. (2025). Public Phar­ma for Euro­pe Coali­ti­on. https://publicpharmaforeurope.org/


×