Inter­na­tio­nal Asso­cia­ti­on of Health Poli­cy

Bülent Şık, for­mer depu­ty direc­tor of the Food Safe­ty and Agri­cul­tu­ral Rese­arch Cen­ter at Akde­niz Uni­ver­si­ty, was con­vic­ted of dis­clo­sing clas­si­fied infor­ma­ti­on after he published the results as a four-part series in a Tur­ki­sh news­pa­per in April 2018. “Bülent Şık ful­fil­led his duty as a citi­zen and a sci­en­tist and he used his right to free­dom of expres­si­on,” his lawy­er, Can Ata­lay, said in his clo­sing state­ment befo­re the sen­tence was han­ded down by a court in Istan­bul.

The stu­dy was com­mis­sio­ned by Turkey’s Minis­try of Health to see whe­ther the­re was a con­nec­tion bet­ween toxi­ci­ty in soil, water, and food and the high inci­dence of can­cer in wes­tern Tur­key. Working for 5 years, Şık and a team of sci­en­tists dis­co­ver­ed dan­ge­rous levels of pesti­ci­des, hea­vy metals, and poly­cy­clic aro­ma­tic hydro­car­bons in mul­ti­ple food and water samples from seve­ral pro­vin­ces in wes­tern Tur­key. Water in seve­ral resi­den­ti­al are­as was also found to be unsafe for drin­king becau­se of lead, alu­mi­num, chro­me, and arse­nic pol­lu­ti­on.

In 2015, after the stu­dy was com­ple­ted, Şık testi­fied that he urged govern­ment offi­ci­als to take action during a mee­ting to dis­cuss the fin­dings. After 3 years of inac­tion, Şık testi­fied, he deci­ded to publish his fin­dings in Cum­hu­ri­y­et, an Istan­bul news­pa­per that has been a high-pro­fi­le tar­get in the government’s crack­down on media. (Bülent Şık is the brot­her of Ahmet Şık, an oppo­si­ti­on mem­ber of Par­lia­ment and for­mer inves­ti­ga­ti­ve jour­na­list at Cum­hu­ri­y­et who was pre­vious­ly jai­led for cri­ti­ci­zing the govern­ment).

“What is quite striking in this case is that the Minis­try of Health did not argue that what Bülent Şık published was not true,” says Mile­na Buy­um, a seni­or cam­pai­gner on Tur­key at Amnes­ty Inter­na­tio­nal in Lon­don. Ins­tead, Buy­um says, the government’s asser­ti­on that the infor­ma­ti­on was con­fi­den­ti­al sug­gests the­re was a real dan­ger to health.

Under Tur­ki­sh law, Şık could have avo­ided jail and recei­ved a sus­pen­ded sen­tence by expres­sing reg­ret. But he decli­ned to do so when asked by the judge.

“[H]iding data obtai­ned from rese­arch pre­vents us from having sound dis­cus­sions about the solu­ti­ons,” Şık said in a state­ment to the court pro­vi­ded to Sci­ence by his lawy­er. “In my artic­les, I aimed to inform the public about this public health stu­dy, which was kept secret, and prompt the public aut­ho­ri­ties who should sol­ve the pro­blems to take action.”

Şık, who lost his uni­ver­si­ty posi­ti­on in 2016 after sig­ning a peti­ti­on cal­ling for peace bet­ween Tur­ki­sh forces and Kur­dish mili­tants in sou­the­ast Tur­key, remains free pen­ding an appeal. Scores of Tur­ki­sh sci­en­tists have been fired from their jobs, pro­se­cu­ted, or ser­ved time in jail in a crack­down on dis­sent that fol­lo­wed a fai­led coup attempt in 2016.

Source: Sci­ence­Mag



×